Habitchation at BFRO

[Shackydo]

I been reading about bogfoot on the BFRO and how a women name of Amy is habitchuating bigfoot.   I am not a membar of there site but like reading it anyways.  I believe Amy.  I dont know why but I just do.    Ever sinse I found the BRFO I have looked and founded other bigfoot forums.  I'm not inpressed to say the least.    I find it funny how were sopposed to belive everthing people like D.O. and his encounters and he ain't even got pictures.  Lest Amys got pitures and plenty of them!  Iread this forum to.   I don't know Driverloperator from Adam but hes a good exampel of how people can go gaa gaa over one persons so called bigfeot experiensce and then crap on someone whos obviosly telling the truth like Ammy.  If I ever so lucky to see bigfooot I wouldnit tell a sole on most forums.   I think if bigfoot is every found the goverment would get involved and ruin it anyway what do any of you people think?  Bifoot is for studiying not for putting in a cage.  Some think he is paronormal I not to sure about that kind of thinking.   I htink flish and blood.  Like sombody says on the BRFO forum there is said to be several types of bigfoots some look like Patty with harry body.  some look more like the neandrathal man with.  some look like homopidins and are quite small compared to the ones out west.   What kind does anyone thinks Amys is?    Also think people should leave Ammy alone.  most  sasqatch researchers are just jellous.

[Shackydo]

I was looking at the MABRC this morning and read were somebody said more or less things was getting out off a hand at Ammys.   They think some orgasnation was wanting to prove a hoax or harvest a bigfoot and that someone fired a shot.  Not good in my opionion.  I have one question----  Why is there so much jellousy between resarchers?   You would think researchers would work together to hep one or the other to get information on what makes this bigfoot tick.  I guess hunting for bigfot  is no different than any other scientiffic or other jobs.   Always somebody wanting to get all off the credit for something.  I think this site is a good site from what i can see.   I don't think the moderater puts up with the likes of DO bulletmaker duckwingdL and others that go from site to site because of professinal jellousy and the fact they can't live with other peoples sucess.    like I said I have read some of these forums and after a while you see different ones showing up on other sites cause they are insanly jellous.   I know some of Ammis story sounds outraygoues but for some reason I think its thetruth.

Ps.  I know I will catch the dickens for my spelling.   Just because someone is not a good speller doesnot mean there dont have just as much interest in bigfoot or saqatch.  There would be more people post on sites if they didnt think they would be tease or talk down to.  I have only seen bigfoot once as a child.  One day I might tell the encounter if I don't get teased or whatever.    I might have my wife do the typing because she is a good speller.  Promblem is shes never here.  Shes either at work or at her friends house.

[Bill]

For NOW we will ignore the spelling and move on past it. Whether you are faking your lack of spelling talent or whether you truly are a poor speller for now we'll not make an issue here. We will however reserve the right to change that position later should Ray and John's suspicions prove correct.


But for now we'll just accept you for what you claim to be and let it go at that. However please be aware we're really not interested in the internal politics of other sites on this one. So please leave those sites there for the most part and let's just discuss the primary topic of interest here which is Bigfoot.

I'm not familiar with Amy or her claims. I seldom visit other bigfoot sites and am a member of only a small number of them and neither of the sites you visit are among those of which I am a member or which I visit which might be why I've not heard of her. If you wish to discuss her or her claims we'll go along with it FOR NOW but let's talk the claims not the internal politics of sites on which she posts. Let's leave personalities out of the discussion as well and stick to the topic of bigfoot not human interactions and the rationale for them.

Should it be determined at some later date that your purpose in being here is to stir up trouble we'll deal with it then. Until then we'll assume your motives are pure and clean as new snow and allow you to participate. Our rules here are lax but there are rules and we do expect all to follow them and to play nice. Let's stick to bigfoot discussion and not what's going on at other sites for the most part. That is not to say you cannot mention an event mentioned elsewhere but when you do stick to the event not the personalities of the folks there in doing so.

[Shackydo]

This is exaclty why I dont post on sites.  I've seen way worse spellers than me on forums and yes they generally get abused.     All I want to do is talk about saqatch.   The reason I used DO as an exampel in mypost is  because he is always raising cain about this and that concerning sasqatch.    As I mentioned before I read lots of forums and sites about bigfoot so I see the same people on different sites.  I am learning disabled but Iam a person.

[pattymac]

Hello Shackydo,  I think some around here are a little gun shy when it comes to new people posting. Nothing personal. I have talked to ammi on a couple of occasions. With her what you see is what you get. She don't add to what she sees. Nor will she kiss up to researchers for the sake of being popular. I now am proud to call ammi my friend. Several here on this forum know me and know that I take that term very much to heart when calling someone my friend.

I enjoy her thread on BFRO. We can say the names of other forums? I was saddened to know that some clowns actually went to her home and trespassed on her land. My hope is some of the cams hidden around caught them in the act, of trespass and discharging a firearm on private property after dark. As I understand it she has contacted the law and they in turn are camping out in the area on the look out for several people. 

I for one will not be drug into a debate on a personal level about Sasquatch. As my granny used to say I know what I know and thats all I have to say.

[Bill]

You are not being accused of anything at this point. Poor spelling is somewhat common and misspellings are very common all over the internet and I am at times guilty myself. As I said if your spelling errors are genuine then it's no problem at all. We can read what you're saying and understand it fine.

But do understand that we've had a fair bit of problems with folks registering just to upset the apple cart here as well as they have at other bigfoot sites. Folks get a bit gunshy from that but don't let their suspicous nature turn you off so soon.

If you are genuine and want to discuss the subject you'll be welcomed here just give the regulars a bit of time to get to know you. If you're not genuine then that too will show in time and as I said we deal with problems as they happen and won't prejudge you for your spelling.

My comments were made to explain that discussions here are to be on topic not of other sites specifically and yeah I've even had to caution the most regular of posters here in that regard so don't think you've been singled out in that regard.

Yes pattymac it's perfectly fine to mention other sites here. What isn't Ok is to try to put down others here or to bring arguments from other places here. I think I know you at this point well enough to know that your goals in being here are precisely what this site is about.

You can mention a discussion from another site and then begin a discussion here of that same topic. But let's try to limit the discussions to the topic not the "discussion on the other site". In other words don't make the thread on the other site the topic here but rather use the topic of it to be the topic here. Is that clear as mud?

[Ray Ford]

This is exaclty why I dont post on sites.  I've seen way worse spellers than me on forums and yes they generally get abused.     All I want to do is talk about saqatch.   The reason I used DO as an exampel in mypost is  because he is always raising cain about this and that concerning sasqatch.     As I mentioned before I read lots of forums and sites about bigfoot so I see the same people on different sites.  I am learning disabled but Iam a person.

As Bill said, if you are for real, you can post here all you want--as long as you stay away from personalities.  I can live with poor spelling and have no desire to abuse anyone.    

As for me, I've only posted on one other site, MABRC, and I didn't start the trouble.  But that's not at all important here and not anything that I want to discuss.  I'll accept your statement that you are learning disabled, and I will affirm you as a person.  I would qualify as a professional writer, and I have more trouble than people might realize with spelling.  Your post, curiously, had a few word segments in it that were much better put together than others.  That inconsistancy was what I picked up on.  

Now, all I have to do is get acquainted with Ammi.

[pattymac]

Hey shackydo I found this link on another forum its a spell check that works on about anything. http://www.tinyspell.m6.net/
It makes a little sound when something is not spelled correctly. I always worry about my spelling. I keep hearing my 5th grade teacher after all these years in my ear. She would look at something and ask are you sure that's spelled correctly.  

Now back to the topic at hand. I would like to know why it is that people that have a habituation relationship are ridiculed and driven away. Why they are the liars and fakes? Why is it not believable that someone can have a relationship with a sasquatch/s?

[Bill]

You folks done got me curious. What's the low down on Ammi and the squatch? Inquiring minds want to know.

[#59]

You folks done got me curious. What's the low down on Ammi and the squatch? Inquiring minds want to know.

From what I can tell it's a person in North Carolina that claims to have a long history of interaction with SF...I am aware of some people (that I put a lot of stock in their judgement) are there presently on the scene to either validate or refute that person's assertions.

[pattymac]

Its a very intresting case of long term possibly several generations of habaituation relationships on going in this area.

[Bill]

I seem to remember a show on TV some while back about a female who claimed to be regularly visited by Bigfoot and that they had conversations and that she gave him or them food and such. Am not sure that I can remember any discussion of cohabitation mentioned but it might have been.

Is this possibly the same person? I do recall that on that show there was some hair she had claimed was his given to the investigators doing the filming and it was determined to be some known not unknown creature but for the life of me I don't recall what. The bottom line on that one was they found no real evidence the story was true but then none it wasn't either. She just really had no evidence that would hold up at that time. This was some while back anyone remember that show? Any chance we're talking about the same person ya think?

[#59]

I seem to remember a show on TV some while back about a female who claimed to be regularly visited by Bigfoot and that they had conversations and that she gave him or them food and such. Am not sure that I can remember any discussion of cohabitation mentioned but it might have been.

Is this possibly the same person? I do recall that on that show there was some hair she had claimed was his given to the investigators doing the filming and it was determined to be some known not unknown creature but for the life of me I don't recall what. The bottom line on that one was they found no real evidence the story was true but then none it wasn't either. She just really had no evidence that would hold up at that time. This was some while back anyone remember that show? Any chance we're talking about the same person ya think?

Bill,

You may be referring to a person named Janice Coy-Carter in east Tennessee who is a seperate incident from this Ammi person who is located in North Carolina.

[#59]

I believe that woman is enjoying her bit of fame and popularity. If any habituation existed it would be impossible to keep it a secret. She's full of it. POWDERMAN. 

Also, seems that some websites are enjoying their bit of fame and popularity by bashing folks like her w/o the benefit of having any factual evidence (one way or the other) to substantiate their position.  Of course, it's always been much simpler and easier to just "hang 'em" w/o having to go through the time and expense of collecting evidence much less having a trial.  IMHO, this style and pattern of behavior really goes a long way in validating their claims as preeminent world-class "researchers". 

[Prairie Ghost]

As far as habitation, it seems that certain people claim to have it.  They are almost always female.  They have had a tragic history of being abused by their father or ex-spouse.  They don't have much social life.  Often they are single parents, and I have found that there is also a past history of substance abuse.  Suddenly they are on the internet and claim to know the 'secret' about bigfoot, and more knowledge than the average person.  Bigfoot becomes everything to them, or their Bigfoot Jesus who is the answer to all their problems.  Bigfoot can read their minds, bigfoot only shows himself/herself to that person.  Bigfoot speaks to them, and they see bigfoot everywhere that other people don't.

I don't know anything about the case at the bfro site, but I have come to believe that most cases of habituation are fantasies of people who are social outsiders, failed relationships, sexually repressed and stubstance abusers.

Yes I do believe there is such thing as bigfoot.  But they don't need anything from us, and have no desire to establish social contact with us.

I am sorry if I sounded harsh, but I am getting tired of these habituation cases that never come up with any results or evidence.  They will create a big hoopla, but nothing ever comes out of them.

Shackydo, I have good news for you.  Your learning disabilites can be overcome.  I once had the exact same ones that you have, and you can see how far I have come.  After a lot of work on reading/writing and english, it can be cured.  Good luck to you on that; I know that you can overcome it.